Application of integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection: A conceptual framework for Nian Electronic

Document Type : Scientific Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Management and Industrial Engineering, Sadjad University of technology, Mashhad, Iran

2 Lecturer, Department of Management and Industrial Engineering, Sadjad University of Technology, Mashhad, Iran, Email: Amirhossein.enzebati@gmail.com

Abstract

Supplier Evaluation is one of the most important decision processes in supply chain management; having different selection criteria beyond price, quality and delivery time. Realizing the importance of this process for the industry, the purpose of the present study is to use two decision making analysis techniques to provide a flexible framework for evaluating and selecting suppliers. Based on the challenge of Nian Electronic Company to the need to revise the supplier evaluation process, the proposed framework of the present research was implemented in this organization. In this way, a team of experts was selected to provide the required data set to implement the proposed research framework in four areas: selection of criteria set, their pairwise comparisons, significance level of each criterion and scoring to suppliers. The code for executing the criteria weighting phases and ranking the alternatives was written in MATLAB software. All of the present research data and the proposed framework is applicable to any industrial context. In order to test the proposed framework, a numerical example was solved and the supplier ranking results were presented

Keywords


[1] Galankashi, M. R., Helmi, S. A., & Hashemzahi, P. (2016). Supplier selection in automobile industry: A mixed balanced scorecard–fuzzy AHP approach. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(1), 93-100.
[2] Kotula, M., Ho, W., Dey, P. K., & Lee, C. K. M. (2015). Strategic sourcing supplier selection misalignment with critical success factors: Findings from multiple case studies in Germany and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 238-247.
[3] Dey, P. K., Bhattacharya, A., Ho, W., & Clegg, B. (2015). Strategic supplier performance evaluation: A case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organisation. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 192-214.
[4] Karsak, E. E., & Dursun, M. (2015). An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82, 82-93.
[5] Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698.
[6] Amorim, P., Curcio, E., Almada-Lobo, B., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P., & Grossmann, I. E. (2016). Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(3), 801-814.
[7] Görener, A., Ayvaz, B., Kuşakcı, A. O., & Altınok, E. (2017). A hybrid type-2 fuzzy based supplier performance evaluation methodology: The Turkish Airlines technic case. Applied Soft Computing, 56, 436-445.
[8] Abdollahzadeh, H., & Atashgar, K. (2017). Optimal design of a multi-state system with uncertainty in supplier selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 411-424.
[9] Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2017). A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 156-174.
[10] Asadabadi, M. R. (2017). A customer based supplier selection process that combines quality function deployment, the analytic network process and a Markov chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(3), 1049-1062.
[11] Schätzle, S., & Jacob, F. (2017). Stereotypical supplier evaluation criteria as inferred from country-of-origin information. Industrial Marketing Management.
[12] Parkouhi, S. V., & Ghadikolaei, A. S. (2017). A resilience approach for supplier selection: Using fuzzy analytic network process and grey VIKOR techniques. Journal of cleaner production, 161, 431-451.
[13] Vahidi, F., Torabi, S. A., & Ramezankhani, M. J. (2018). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1351-1365.
[14] Lima-Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2016). Combining SCOR® model and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and management. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 128-141.
 [15] Gold, S., & Awasthi, A. (2015). Sustainable global supplier selection extended towards sustainability risks from (1+ n) th tier suppliers using fuzzy AHP based approach. Ifac-Papersonline, 48(3), 966-971.
[16] Sarkar, S., Pratihar, D. K., & Sarkar, B. (2018). An integrated fuzzy multiple criteria supplier selection approach and its application in a welding company. Journal of manufacturing systems, 46, 163-178.
 [17] Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature.
[18] Kamvysi, K., Gotzamani, K., Georgiou, A. C., & Andronikidis, A. (2010). Integrating DEAHP and DEANP into the quality function deployment. The TQM Journal, 22(3), 293-316.
[19] Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2014). Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), 156-167.
[20] Guarnieri, P., & Trojan, F. (2019). Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: A study in the textile industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 347-361.
[21] Galo, N. R., Calache, L. D. D. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2018). A group decision approach for supplier categorization based on hesitant fuzzy and ELECTRE TRI. International Journal of Production Economics, 202, 182-196.
 [22] Jadidi, O., Cavalieri, S., & Zolfaghari, S. (2015). An improved multi-choice goal programming approach for supplier selection problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(14), 4213-4222.
[23] مقدس، ز. واعظ قاسمی، م. رحمانی پرچکلایی، ب. (1396) " انتخاب بهترین تامین کننده با ورودی و خروجی‌های انعطاف‌پذیر در مدیریت زنجیره تامین با تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها" مجله پژوهش‌های نوین در علوم ریاضی، سال سوم، شماره یازدهم.
[24] کاظمی، ن. بزرگی امیری، ع. محمدپور عمران، م. (1396) "ارائه‌ی یک مدل ترکیبی از ANP فازی بازه‌ای، FMEA فازی بازه‌ای برای انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان تحت شرایط ریسک"، مجله مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت شریف، دوره 1-23، شماره 1، صفحه 123-134.
[25] Graham, G., Freeman, J., & Chen, T. (2015). Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
[27] Chai, J., & Ngai, E. W. (2015). Multi-perspective strategic supplier selection in uncertain environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 215-225.
[28] Tavana, M., Fallahpour, A., Di Caprio, D., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2016). A hybrid intelligent fuzzy predictive model with simulation for supplier evaluation and selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 61, 129-144.
[29] Bohner, C., & Minner, S. (2017). Supplier selection under failure risk, quantity and business volume discounts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 104, 145-155.
[30] Shabanpour, H., Yousefi, S., & Saen, R. F. (2017). Future planning for benchmarking and ranking sustainable suppliers using goal programming and robust double frontiers DEA. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 50, 129-143.
[31] Manerba, D., Mansini, R., & Perboli, G. (2018). The capacitated supplier selection problem with total quantity discount policy and activation costs under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 198, 119-132.
[32] نعمتی ابوذر، وحید. بهشتی‌نیا، محمدعلی. (1394) " ارائة مدلی جدید در تصمیم گیری چندمعیارة فازی به منظور رتبه‌بندی  تأمین کنندگان )مطالعة موردی: شرکت تبلیغاتی(، نشریه تخصصی مهندسی صنایع، دوره 49، شماره 2، صفحه 287-298.
[33] ابراهیم‌پور ازبری، م. اکبری، م. عبداللهی، ع. موحدمنش، و. (1396) "ارایه چارچوبی برای ارزیابی عملکرد مدیران با استفاده از تاپسیس فازی و تحلیل پوششی داده‌های فازی"، مجله تحقیق در عملیات در کاربردهای آن، سال چهاردهم، شماره چهارم، صفحه 107-89.
Volume 22, Issue 69 - Serial Number 69
February 2021
Pages 83-100
  • Receive Date: 22 November 2019
  • Revise Date: 23 December 2020
  • Accept Date: 09 June 2020
  • Publish Date: 08 February 2021