به سوی پایداری در صنعت 5/0: تحلیل پیشران ها و موانع پیاده سازی اقتصاد مدور در زنجیره تامین صنعت پتروشیمی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری دانشکده مدیریت، گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشگاه آزاد ‌اسلامی، واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران

چکیده

با سرعت فزاینده جهانی شدن، شرکت‌های فعال در زنجیره تأمین صنعت پتروشیمی به دنبال دستیابی به زنجیره تأمین پیچیده‌تر، مشتری‌محور و پایدارتر هستند. در این میان، اگرچه صنعت 4/0 نقش کاتالیزوری در‌گذار از اقتصاد خطی به اقتصاد مدور ایفا کرده است، اما با اولویت دادن به ماشین‌ها بر انسان، برخی از اهداف پایداری5/0 منجر به هم‌افزایی پایدار در صنایع مختلف می‌شود. با این حال، اجرای اقتصاد مدور همواره پیشران‌ها و موانعی را به همراه دارد. بنابراین، هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی و تحلیل پیشران‌ها و موانع اجرای اقتصاد مدور در زنجیره تأمین صنعت پتروشیمی مبتنی بر پایداری در صنعت 5/0 می‌باشد. بدین منظور، در مرحله اول پیشران‌ها و موانع با استفاده از مرور ادبیات شناسایی شدند. در این بخش سه پیشران اصلی و چهار مانع کلیدی توسط کارشناسان و متخصصان با استفاده از روش دلفی تأیید شد. در مرحله بعد، روابط میان این پیشران‌ها و موانع در قالب نرم‌افزار MICMAC شناسایی و سطوح آن‌ها با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری تعیین شد. در نهایت، یک مدل شماتیک از پیشران‌ها و موانع اجرای اقتصاد مدور مبتنی بر پایداری صنعت 5/0 در زنجیره تأمین صنعت پتروشیمی ترسیم شد. بر اساس وابستگی و نیروی پیشرانه، موانع شناسایی شده به چهار خوشه تقسیم شدند. نتایج نشان داد که موانع طراحی و مهندسی و پیشران‌های اجتماعی تأثیر کمی بر اجرای اقتصاد مدور دارند. موانع فنی نیز در خوشه مستقل قرار دارند و نفوذ بالایی دارند. شایان ذکر است موانع اقتصادی و پیشران‌های فناوری و اقتصادی نیز در خوشه پیوندی قرار دارند. این موانع قدرت نفوذ و وابستگی بالایی دارند و می‌توانند بر اجرای اقتصاد مدور تأثیر بگذارند. علاوه‌ بر این، موانع لجستیک و زنجیره تأمین که در سطح بالایی قرار گرفتند به عنوان متغیر‌های وابسته شناخته می‌شوند که قدرت وابستگی بالایی دارند. یافته‌های مطالعه حاضر برای ذینفعان زنجیره تأمین پتروشیمی در استقرار اقتصاد مدور مبتنی بر صنعت 5/0 مفید خواهد بود و به مدیران در تصمیم‌گیری قاطع‌تر در انتخاب، اجرا و ارزیابی پروژه‌هایی که از رویکرد‌های پایداری و اقتصاد مدور در زنجیره تأمین استفاده می‌کنند، کمک می‌کند. در نهایت، نتایج این مطالعه می‌تواند مبنایی برای تحقیقات تجربی آینده در راستای حمایت از پیاده‌سازی کارآمد اقتصاد مدور و امکان‌گذار از زنجیره تأمین خطی به یک زنجیره تأمین مدور باشد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Towards Sustainability in Industry 5.0: Analysis of Drivers and Barriers to Implementing Circular Economy in the Petrochemical Industry Supply Chain

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Shirazi 1
  • Kaveh Alba 2
  • Hossein Bakhtiari 3
1 Assistant Prof., Department of Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
2 PhD Student, Faculty of Management, Department of Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
3 Master's Degree, Department of Management, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
چکیده [English]

With the accelerating pace of globalization, companies operating within the petrochemical industry’s supply chain strive to develop more complex, customer-centric, and sustainable supply chains. Amid this transformation, although Industry 4.0 has played a catalytic role in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy, its prioritization of machines over humans has led to the neglect of some sustainability objectives. Industry 5.0, however, focuses on integrating technology with human values to achieve sustainable development goals. Combining the circular economy and Industry 5.0 leads to sustainable synergies across various industries. Nevertheless, implementing a circular economy is accompanied by both drivers and barriers. Accordingly, the present study aims to identify and analyze the drivers and barriers of implementing a circular economy in the petrochemical industry’s supply chain, based on sustainability within the framework of Industry 5.0. In the first phase, the drivers and barriers were identified through a literature review. In this stage, three main drivers and four key barriers were validated by experts using the Delphi technique. In the next phase, the relationships among these drivers and barriers were identified using MICMAC software, and their hierarchical levels were determined through the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) technique. Ultimately, a schematic model of the drivers and barriers to implementing a circular economy based on Industry 5.0 sustainability in the petrochemical supply chain was developed. Based on their influence and dependence, the identified barriers were classified into four clusters. The results indicated that design and engineering barriers, as well as social drivers, have a limited impact on implementing a circular economy. Technical barriers, which fall under the independent cluster, have a high level of influence. Notably, economic barriers and technologicaland economic drivers were categorized in thelinkage cluster, indicating high levels of bothinfl uence and dependence, and therefore asubstantial impact on circular economyimplementation. In addition, logistics and supply chainbarriers, which were placed at the top level,were identifi ed as dependent variables withhigh dependence power. The findings of this study will be beneficial for stakeholders in the petrochemical supply chain in implementing a circular economy based on Industry 5.0. They will support managers in making moredecisive choices regarding the selection,implementation, and evaluation of projectsthat employ sustainability and circulareconomy approaches in the supply chain. Ultimately, the results of this study can serve as a foundation for future empirical research aimed at supporting the effective implementation of a circular economy and facilitating the transition from a linear to a circular supply chain.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Circular Economy
  • Industry 5.0
  • Petrochemical Supply Chain
  • MICMAC Analysis
  • Interpretive Structural Modeling

Smiley face

مراجع

  • Narula, J. P. Tamvada, A. Kumar, H. Puppala, and N. Gupta, "Putting digital technologies at the forefront of Industry 0/5 for the implementation of a circular economy in manufacturing industries," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3344373
  • S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, and S. A. Gawankar, "Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives," Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 117, pp. 408-425, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009
  • Xu, Y. Lu, B. Vogel-Heuser, and L. Wang, "Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 61, pp. 530-535, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
  • Fraga-Lamas, S. I. Lopes, and T. M. Fernández-Caramés, "Green IoT and edge AI as key technological enablers for a sustainable digital transition towards a smart circular economy: An Industry 5.0 use case," Sensors, vol. 21, no. 17, p. 5745, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/s21175745
  • Huang, B. Wang, X. Li, P. Zheng, D. Mourtzis, and L. Wang, "Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 64, pp. 424-428, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010
  • Leng et al., "Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 65, pp. 279-295, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017
  • Kannan et al., "Unveiling barriers to the integration of blockchain‐based circular economy and Industry 5.0 in manufacturing industries: A strategic prioritization approach," Business Strategy and The Environment, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3886
  • Kannan et al., "Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach," Science of the Total Environment, vol. 722, p. 137936, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137936
  • Govindan et al., "A location-inventory-routing problem to design a circular closed-loop supply chain network with carbon tax policy for achieving circular economy: An augmented epsilon-constraint approach," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 257, p. 108771, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108771
  • R. Luttenberger, "Waste management challenges in transition to circular economy–case of Croatia," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 256, p. 120495, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120495
  • Manoharan et al., "Contextual relationships among drivers and barriers to circular economy: An integrated ISM and DEMATEL approach," Sustainable Operations and Computers, vol. 3, pp. 43-53, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.003
  • Nasyiah et al., "Explaining Sustainable Performance with SEM–FsQCA: The Role of Traceability Systems, Knowledge Management, Halal SCM Practices, and Spiritual Leadership in Small–Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 71, pp. 5691-5705, 2024. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3365660
  • Yao et al., "From intelligent manufacturing to smart manufacturing for Industry 4.0 driven by next generation artificial intelligence and further on," in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Enterprise Systems (ES), 2017, pp. 311-318. DOI: 10.1109/ES.2017.58
  • Kaur and S. P. Singh, "Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 231, p. 107830, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107830
  • Godinho Filho et al., "The relationship between circular economy, industry 4.0 and supply chain performance: a combined ISM/fuzzy MICMAC approach," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2772, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/su14052772
  • Vacchi et al., "Industry 4.0 and smart data as enablers of the circular economy in manufacturing: Product re-engineering with circular eco-design," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 10366, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su131810366
  • Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Nayal, K., Kraus, S., Yadav, V. S., & Narkhede, B. E, to identify industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM-ANP. Journal of cleaner production, 293, 126023, 2021. DOI: 1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023
  • Sikder, M. R., Saif, S. J. A., Nadim, S. A., Tarik, K. I. B., & Islam, R, Integrating Circular Economy and Industry 5.0 for Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Food Industry. Supply Chain Insider| ISSN: 2617-7420 (Print), 2617-7420 (Online), 9(1). 2023.
  • Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of business ethics, 140, 369-380, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
  • Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(2), 421-432, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13187
  • Niskanen, J., Anshelm, J., & McLaren, D. Local conflicts and national consensus: The strange case of circular economy in Sweden. Journal of cleaner production, 261, 121117, 2020. DOI: 1016/j.jclepro.2020.121117
  • Inigo, E. A., & Blok, V. Strengthening the socio-ethical foundations of the circular economy: Lessons from responsible research and innovation. Journal of cleaner production, 233, 280-291, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.053
  • Abdul-Hamid, A.-Q., Ali, M. H., Tseng, M.-L., Lan, S., & Kumar, M. Impeding challenges on industry 4.0 in circular economy: Palm oil industry in Malaysia. Computers & Operations Research, 123, 105052, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.105052
  • Han, J., Heshmati, A., & Rashidghalam, M. Circular economy business models with a focus on servitization. Sustainability, 12(21), 8799, 2020 DOI: 10.3390/su12218799
  • D’Adamo, I., & Lupi, G. Sustainability and resilience after COVID-19: A circular premium in the fashion industry. Sustainability, 13(4), 1861, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su13041861
  • Bernon, M., Tjahjono, B., & Ripanti, E. F. Aligning retail reverse logistics practice with circular economy values: an exploratory framework. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 483-497, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449266
  • Atif, S. Analysing the alignment between circular economy and industry 4.0 nexus with industry 5.0 era: An integrative systematic literature review. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2155-2175, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2542
  • Atif, S., Ahmed, S., Wasim, M., Zeb, B., Pervez, Z., & Quinn, L. Towards a conceptual development of industry 4.0, servitisation, and circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(11), 6501, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/su13116501
  • Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. Economics of natural resources and the environment. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
  • Turner, R. K., & Pearce, D. W. The ethical foundations of sustainable economic development. International Institute for Environment and Development London, UK, 1990.
  • MacArthur, E. Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 23-44, 2013.
  • Dev, N. K., Shankar, R., & Qaiser, F. H. Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Operational excellence for sustainable reverse supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104583, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104583
  • Hasheminasab, H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Kharrazi, M., & Skare, M. A circular economy model for fossil fuel sustainable decisions based on MADM techniques. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 564-582, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1926305
  • Karuppiah, K., Sankaranarayanan, B., Ali, S. M., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Bhalaji, R. Inhibitors to circular economy practices in the leather industry using an integrated approach: Implications for sustainable development goals in emerging economies. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1554-1568, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.015
  • Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Mäkinen, S. J. Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 70-82, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017
  • Sindhwani, R., Afridi, S., Kumar, A., Banaitis, A., Luthra, S., & Singh, P. L. Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers. Technology in Society, 68, 101887, DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101887
  • Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., & Straka, M. Identification of social and economic expectations: Contextual reasons for the transformation process of Industry 4.0 into the Industry 5.0 concept. Sustainability, 14(3), 1391, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/su14031391
  • Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. Industry 5.0: towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Luxembourg, LU: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 46, 2021.
  • Enang, E., Bashiri, M., & Jarvis, D. Exploring the transition from techno centric industry 4.0 towards value centric industry 5.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 61(22), 7866-7902, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2221344
  • Kakadellis, S., Woods, J., & Harris, Z. M. Friend or foe: Stakeholder attitudes towards biodegradable plastic packaging in food waste anaerobic digestion. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, 105529, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105529
  • Díaz-Chao, Á., Ficapal-Cusí, P., & Torrent-Sellens, J. Environmental assets, industry 4.0 technologies and firm performance in Spain: A dynamic capabilities path to reward sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 281, 125264, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125264
  • Hummels, H., & Argyrou, A. Planetary demands: Redefining sustainable development and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of cleaner production, 278, 123804. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123804
  • Srivastava, S. K. Green supply‐chain management: a state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 53-80, 2007. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x
  • Isernia, R., Passaro, R., Quinto, I., & Thomas, A. The reverse supply chain of the e-waste management processes in a circular economy framework: Evidence from Italy. Sustainability, 11(8), 2430, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/su11082430
  • Soleimani, H., Chhetri, P., Fathollahi-Fard, A.M., Mirzapour Al-e-Hashem, S., and Shahparvari, S.: ‘Sustainable closed-loop supply chain with energy efficiency: Lagrangian relaxation, reformulations and heuristics’, Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 318, (1), pp. 531-556 DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04661-z
  • Zou, H., Qin, J., Yang, P., and Dai, B.: ‘A coordinated revenue-sharing model for a sustainable closed-loop supply chain’, Sustainability, 2018, 10, (9), pp. 3198 DOI: 10.3390/su10093198
  • Nasr, A.K., Tavana, M., Alavi, B., and Mina, H.: ‘A novel fuzzy multi-objective circular supplier selection and order allocation model for sustainable closed-loop supply chains’, Journal of Cleaner production, 2021, 287, pp. 124994 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124994
  • Lozano-Oviedo, J., Cortés, C.E., and Rey, P.A.: ‘Sustainable closed-loop supply chains and their optimization models: a review of the literature’, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2024, 26, (4), pp. 999-1023 DOI: 10.1007/s10098-023-02730-w
  • Shirazi, H., Bakhtiari, H., & Ghasemian Sahebi, I. Studying the influence of trust and commitment on sustainable supply chain performance considering the mediating role of supply flexibility The case of the petrochemical industry. Research in Production and Operations Management, 15(1), 29-50, 2024. DOI: 10.22108/pom.2024.138777.1525
  • Muhindo, A., Zhou, J., & Mzuza, M. K. Impact of logistics outsourcing strategy in oil and gas industry in Uganda. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(6), 187, 2014. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n6p187
  • Lambert, D. M., & Enz, M. G. Issues in supply chain management: Progress and potential. Industrial marketing management,62,1-16, DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.12.002
  • کیانی، م.، عندلیب اردکانی، د.، میرفخرالدینی، ح و زارع احمدآبادی، ح. تحلیلی بر موانع پیاده سازی اقتصاد مدور و صنعت 4.0 در زنجیره تامین: رویکرد فراترکیب و دنپ فازی. چشم‌انداز مدیریت صنعتی. 13(4), 9-45 (1402). DOI: 10.48308/jimp.13.4.9
  • کیانی، م.، عندلیب اردکانی، د.، میرفخرالدینی، ح و زارع احمدآبادی، ح. تحلیلی بر توانمندسازهای موثر بر پیاده سازی اقتصاد مدور و صنعت 4.0 در زنجیره تامین. مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی, 21(70), 1-43. (1402) DOI: 10.22054/jims.2023.71900.2835
  • جهانی، م.، مقبل باعرض، ع.، و آذر، ع. طراحی مدل سنجش تاب آوری زنجیره تأمین با رویکرد مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری. چشم انداز مدیریت صنعتی، 7(25)، 91-114. (1396).
  • رئوفی راد، م. شناسایی و اولویت بندی شاخص های پایداری زنجیره تامین پتروشیمی با بهره گیری از تکنیک دیمتل. اولین همایش بین المللی مدیریت پایداری. (1403). https://civilica.com/doc/2159994
  • رفیعیان اصفهانی، م.، یزدانی، بیتا.، براتی، م.، نقش، ا.، و جنتیان، ن. طراحی مدل بلوغ پایداری زنجیره تامین با رویکرد بهبود مستمر (مورد مطالعه: صنعت داروسازی ایران). (1402). https://civilica.com/doc/1942315
  • علی پور, ح.، سلطان پناه، ه.، و فاطمی, ع. ارائه مدلی جهت ارزیابی مدیریت عملکرد زنجیره تامین سبز در صنعت پتروشیمی با استفاده از روش داده بنیاد. فصلنامه جغرافیا (برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای). 12 (49). (1401). DOI: 10.22034/jgeoq.2023.363027.3871
  • کماسی, ح.، میرزاپور آل هاشم، سید م ج. طراحی شبکه زنجیره تأمین پایدار با بکارگیری اصول ناب. مدیریت زنجیره تأمین, 22(69). 101-116. (1399).
  • م, پیام, عالم تبریز، ا.، ارشادی, م ج.، و عزیزی, ا. ارائه مدل برنامه­ریزی ریاضی برای زنجیره تأمین حلقه بسته تاب آور پایدار با در نظر گرفتن معیار پاسخگویی و اثرات غیر قطعی کووید 19. مدیریت زنجیره تأمین, 25(79), 67-86. (1402).
  • بابایی مراد, س. محبی, م.، و باقری, ح. ارائه مدلی برای طراحی شبکه زنجیره تأمین سبز و در نظر گرفتن فروش ازدست‌رفته. مدیریت زنجیره تأمین, 22(66). 74-63. (1399).
  • Turner, C., Oyekan, J., Garn, W., Duggan, C., & Abdou, K. Industry 5.0 and the circular economy: Utilizing LCA with intelligent products. Sustainability, 14(22), 14847, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/su142214847
  • Ebrahimpour Samani, N. Khani, B. Yazdani, and S. M. R. Davoudi, "Designing a sustainable supply chain model in the food and agriculture industries with an emphasis on economic, social, and environmental dimensions: An application of the interpretive structural modeling method", Supply Chain Management, vol. 26, no. 84, pp. 77-102, 2024.
  • Ahmad, X.-W. Tang, J.-N. Qiu, and F. Ahmad, "Interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC analysis for identifying and benchmarking significant factors of seismic soil liquefaction," Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 233, 2019. DOI:10.3390/app9020233.
  • Fleischmann, J., et al. Battery 2030: Resilient, sustainable, and circular. McKinsey & Company, 2-18, 2023.
  • Mulakkal, M., Castillo, A., Taylor, A., Blackman, B., Balint, D., Pimenta, S., & Charalambides, M. Advancing mechanical recycling of multilayer plastics through finite element modelling and environmental policy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 166, 105371, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105371
  • Farsi and B. Honarvar, "Applications of Nanotechnology in Oil and Petrochemical Industries," in Proc. First National Conf. on Nanotechnology Applications in Oil and Petrochemical Industries, Mahshahr, Iran, 2012. Available: DOI: civilica.com/doc/179523.
  • Gholampour Arbastan and M. Rezaei, “Intelligent Waste Management in the Country,” Monthly Expert Reports of the Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, vol. 32, no. 2, p. 19726, 2024. DOI: 10.22034/report.2024.16832.1749.
  • Leong, H., Chang, C.-K., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Chia, S. R., Lim, J., Chang, J.-S., & Show, P.-L. (2021). Waste biorefinery towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy: A solution to global issues. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 14, 1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-01939-5.
  • Bocken, N. M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
  • Hazen, B. T., Mollenkopf, D. A., & Wang, Y. Remanufacturing for the circular economy: An examination of consumer switching behavior. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 451-464, 2017. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1929
  • Kirchherr, J., et al. Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264-272, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
  • Kabeyi, D., & Olanrewaju, O. Review and design overview of plastic waste-to-pyrolysis oil conversion with implications on the energy transition. Journal of Energy, 2023, 1-25, 2023. DOI: 10.1155/2023/1821129
  • Huysman, S., De Schaepmeester, J., Ragaert, K., Dewulf, J., & De Meester, S. Performance indicators for a circular economy: A case study on post-industrial plastic waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 46-54, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.013
  • Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. Exploring how usage-focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability, 10(3), 639, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/su10030639
  • Kaiser, K., Schmid, M., & Schlummer, M. Recycling of Polymer-Based Multilayer Packaging: A Review. Recycling, 3(1), 1, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/recycling3010001
  • de Tommaso, J., Galli, F., Weber, R., Dubois, J.-L., & Patience, G. Total capital investment of plastic recycling plants correlates with energy losses and capacity. ChemSusChem, 17, 10.1002/cssc.202301172, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202301172
  • Kassab, A., Al Nabhani, D., Mohanty, P., Pannier, C., & Ayoub, G. Y. Advancing Plastic Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities in the Integration of 3D Printing and Distributed Recycling for a Circular Economy. Polymers, 15(19), 3881, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/polym15193881
مدیریت زنجیره تأمین
دوره 27، شماره 88 - شماره پیاپی 88
شماره پیا پی 88 پاییز 1404
آبان 1404
صفحه 35-59

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 26 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 03 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 15 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار: 30 آبان 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار