Risk and resilience are fundamental concepts in disaster management, and addressing both is essential for maintaining humanitarian logistics services during emergencies. This study aimed to identify and evaluate risk and resilience criteria and subcriteria in the humanitarian logistics activities of the Iranian Red Crescent Society. It employed an applied, descriptive-survey design with a mixed-methods approach, conducted in four stages: systematic review and meta-synthesis of 70 studies; semi-structured interviews with experts; screening and validation using the Fuzzy Delphi Method; and analysis of interrelationships using Fuzzy DEMATEL. The expert panel comprised 15 academic specialists and managers involved in the Society’s logistics activities. Overall, nine criteria and 32 subcriteria were identified and validated. The results showed that preparedness for humanitarian logistics network service continuity (C8) had the highest perceived influence, while identifying, assessing, and mitigating network risks (C1) had the greatest network prominence. Developing redundancy in the humanitarian logistics network (C4) exhibited the highest perceived dependence. At the subcriterion level, risk management in contractual processes with suppliers (I4) had the highest perceived influence, whereas developing humanitarian logistics network facilities and structures based on passive defense principles (I32) had the greatest network prominence. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening preparedness and service continuity, managing supplier-related risks, and incorporating structural considerations and passive defense principles into humanitarian logistics planning. The identified influence and dependence patterns reflect expert judgments and should not be interpreted as evidence of empirical or temporal causality.