مدل سازی پایش رفتار حرفه‌ای در زنجیره تأمین با استفاده از بلاکچین

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه حسابداری واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری گروه حسابداری واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران.

3 استادیارگروه حسابداری واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران

چکیده

امروزه با توجه به نقش زنجیره تامین در فرآیند کسب و کار، پایش رفتار حرفه­ای در زنجیره تامین اهمیت زیادی پیدا کرده است. هدف از مطالعه حاضر، مدل­سازی پایش رفتار حرفه‌ای در زنجیره تأمین با استفاده از بلاکچین می­باشد. روش تحقیق در این مطالعه، آمیخته (کیفی و کمّی) و از نوع بنیادی و اکتشافی بود. جامعه آماری در بخش کیفی، شامل اساتید و خبرگان حوزه زنجیره تامین در شهر تهران بودند که با توجه به اشباع نظری، 20 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. جامعه آماری در بخش کمّی، شامل مدیران، معاونان و کارکنان ارشد حوزه زنجیره تامین در شرکت­های خصوصی و دولتی شهر تهران بودند که توسط روش غیراحتمالی و در دسترس، 100 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. در بخش کیفی از ابزار مصاحبه­ی نیمه­ساختار­یافته استفاده شد و تجزیه و تحلیل    داده­های کیفی به روش داده­بنیاد انجام گردید. دسته­بندی داده­های کیفی در 6 شبکه داده بنیاد شامل پدیده محوری (مقوله اصلی یا هسته)، شرایط علّی، شرایط زمینه­ای، شرایط مداخله­گر، راهبردها و پیامدها انجام گردید. در بخش کمّی پرسشنامه­ای از نتایج بخش کیفی طراحی شده و توسط مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی (PLS) و نرم­افزار Smart PLS تحلیل داده­ها انجام شد. بر اساس یافته­های کیفی، اجزای مدل پایش رفتار حرفه‌ای در زنجیره تأمین با استفاده از بلاکچین شامل 11 مولفه اصلی، 24 مولفه فرعی و 86 شاخص بود. بدین ترتیب که پدیده محوری شامل 1 مولفه اصلی نظارت بر اجرای آیین رفتار حرفه­ای در زنجیره تامین توسط سامانه هوشمند مبتنی بر بلاکچین، شرایط علّی شامل 2 مولفه اصلی عوامل سازمانی و عوامل رفتاری، شرایط زمینه­ای شامل 2 مولفه اصلی زیرساخت فناوری و توجه به ارزش­های اخلاقی، شرایط مداخله­گر شامل 2 مولفه اصلی عوامل داخلی و عوامل خارجی، راهبردها شامل 2 مولفه اصلی تجهیز منابع انسانی و برنامه­ریزی و نظارت و پیامدها شامل 2 مولفه اصلی پیامدهای خرد و پیامدهای کلان بودند. همچنین بر اساس یافته­های کمّی، شرایط علّی با ضریب مسیر 316/0 بر پدیده محوری؛ پدیده محوری و شرایط زمینه­ای به ترتیب با ضرایب مسیر 381/0 و 507/0 بر راهبردها؛ و راهبردها با ضریب مسیر 517/0 بر پیامدها تاثیر مثبت و معنی­دار دارند. نتایج حاکی از آن است که با استفاده از فناوری­های مدرن مانند بلاکچین می­توان پایش رفتار حرفه­ای در زنجیره تامین را به­صورت مطلوب­تری به انجام رساند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Modeling Behavioral Governance in the Supply Chain using Blockchain

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyed abbas borhani 1
  • Mehdi Nouri 2
  • Mojgan safa 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Nowadays, considering the role of supply chain in business process, monitoring professional behavior in supply chain has become very important. The purpose of the present study is to model monitoring professional behavior in supply chain using blockchain. The research method in this study was mixed (qualitative and quantitative) and fundamental and exploratory. The statistical population in the qualitative section included professors and experts in the field of supply chain in Tehran, and considering theoretical saturation, 20 people were selected as a sample. The statistical population in the quantitative section included managers, vice presidents and senior employees in the field of supply chain in private and public companies in Tehran, and 100  people were selected as a statistical sample by non-probability and convenience method. In the qualitative section, semi-structured interview tool was used and qualitative data analysis was performed using grounded theory method. Qualitative data were categorized into 6 grounded theory networks including the central phenomenon (main or core category), causal conditions, background conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences. In the quantitative part, a questionnaire was designed from the results of the qualitative part and data analysis was performed using structural equation modeling with the partial least squares (PLS) approach and Smart PLS software. Based on the qualitative findings, the components of the model for monitoring professional behavior in the supply chain using blockchain included 11 main components, 24 subcomponents, and 86 indicators. Thus, the central phenomenon included 1 main component of monitoring the implementation of the code of professional conduct in the supply chain by an intelligent system based on blockchain, causal conditions included 2 main components of organizational factors and behavioral factors, background conditions included 2 main components of technological infrastructure and attention to ethical values, intervening conditions included 2 main components of internal factors and external factors, strategies included 2 main components of human resource mobilization and planning and monitoring, and consequences included 2 main components of micro-consequences and macro-consequences. Also, based on quantitative findings, causal conditions with a path coefficient of 0.316 on the pivotal phenomenon; pivotal phenomenon and background conditions had a positive and significant effect on strategies with path coefficients of 0.381 and 0.507, respectively; and strategies had a path coefficient of 0.517 on consequences. The results indicate that by using modern technologies such as blockchain, professional conduct monitoring in the supply chain can be carried out in a more desirable manner.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Blockchain
  • Behavioral Governance
  • Distributed System
  • Digitalized Supply Chain

Smiley face

مراجع

[1] S. R. Hoseini, G. Tari, S.A. Davodi, and M. Shafiee, “Examining the Factors Affecting the Sustainable Supply Chain with the Blockchain Approach Based on Cognitive Map,” J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 24, no. 77, pp. 23-39, 2023. 20.1001.1.20089198.1401.24.77.3.6 (In Persian)
[2] M. Karimabadi, Z. Hajiha, H. Jahangirnia, and R. Gholami Jamkarani, “Pattern design of data foundation of code of ethics for independent auditors based on a critical perspective in the view of professionals,” Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 105-123, 2024. https://doi.org/10.30495/jdaa.2024.709477 (In Persian)
[3] J. Ratnawati, R. Indah Hernawati, K. Ingsi, and W. Isthika, “The Prevention of Tax Corruption Act: A Study in Indonesia,” Int. J. Bus. & Manag. vol. 5, no. 1, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.internationaljournalcorner.com/index.php/theijbm/article/view/123363
[4] K. Ramazan, S. Tuba, S. Gurkan, and A. Bulent, “Supply chain unethical behaviors and continuity of relationship: Using the PLS approach for testing moderation effects of inter-organizational justice,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 162, pp. 83-91, 2015.
[5] H. Azimi, and S. Paribeigi, “The Effect of Dimension of Unethical Behaviors in the Supply Chain on the Continuity of Communication with the Moderating Role of Organizational Justice,” JER.,” vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 29-46, 2020. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26764180.2020.1.3.2.4 (In Persian)
[6] P. Yadav, M. Steinbach, V. Kumar, and G. Simon, “Mining electronic health records (ehrs): a survey,” ACM Comput. Far E. Surv., vol. 50, no. 6, Article no. 3127881, 2018.
[7] S. Chidambaranathan, and R. Geetha, “Deep learning enabled blockchain based electronic heathcare data attack detection for smart health systems,” Meas. Sens., vol 31, Article no. 100959, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100959
[8] T. Aste, P. Tasca, and T. Di Matteo, “Blockchain technologies: The foreseeable impact on society and industry,” J. Comput., vol 50, no. 9, pp. 18-28, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.3571064
[9] M. el Maouchi, O. Ersoy, and Z. Erkin, “TRADE: A transparent, decentralized traceability system for the supply chain. In: Proceedings of 1st ERCIM Blockchain Workshop 2018,” EUSSET, 2018.
[10] C. Cao, Y. He, Y. Liu, H. Huang, and F. Zhang, “Blockchain technology adoption mechanism for semiconductor chip supply chains considering information disclosure under cost-sharing contract,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., Article no. 109496, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109496
[11] R.R. Pant, G. Prakash, and J.A. Farooquie, (2015). “A framework for traceability and transparency in the dairy supply chain networks,” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 189, pp. 385-394, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.235
[12] Y. Chang, E. Iakovou, and W. Shi, “Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: A Critical Synthesis of the State-of-the-Art, Challenges and Opportunities,” arXiv preprint arXiv, vol. 1901.02715, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1651946
[13] Y. Zhang, “Deploying blockchain technology in the supply chain,” 2019. [online] Available: http://www.intechopen.com/books/computer-security-threats/deploying-blockchain-technology-in-the-supply-chain.
[14] M. Pilkington, “Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In: Research Handbook on Digital Transformations,” Elgaronline, vol. 225, 2016. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2662660
[15] S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, and H. Arha, “Understanding the blockchain technology adoption in supply chains—Indian context,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2009-2033, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1518610
[16] X. Yang, “Blockchain-based supply chain finance design pattern,” IHMSC, pp. 200-203, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/IHMSC52134.2021.00053
[17] L. Su, and H. Wang, “Supply chain finance research in digital bulk commodities service platform based on blockchain,” ECIT, pp. 341-344, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECIT50008.2020.00085
[18] H. Yuan, L. Zhang, B. Cao, and W. Chen, W. “Optimizing traceability scheme in a fresh product supply chain considering product competition in blockchain era,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 258, pp. Article no. 125127, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125127
[19] R. Payandeh, A. Delbari, F. Fardad, J. Helmzadeh, S. Shafiee, and A. Rajabzadeh Ghatari, A. “Unraveling the Potential of Blockchain Technology in Enhancing Supply Chain Traceability: A Systematic Literature Review and Modeling with ISM,” Blockchain: Res Appl., Article no. 100240, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100240
[20] N. Kshetri, “Blockchain systems and ethical sourcing in the mineral and metal industry: a multiple case study,” The Int. J. Logist. Manag., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0108
[21] L.A. Risso, G.M. Devós Ganga, M.G. Filho, L.A. de Santa-Eulalia, T. Chikhi¸T., and E. Mosconi, “Present and future perspectives of blockchain in supply chain management: a review of reviews and research agenda,” CAIE, vol. 179, Article no. 109195, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109195
[22] L. Louw, L. “The role of blockchain in sustainable supply chain management,” BSV Blockchain Latest News, 2024.
[23] E. Lobachev, M. Nabil Mahmoud, and A. Patooghy, A. “Blockchain-based Smart Supply Chain Management,” DSA, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSA56465.2022.00035
[24] M. Ibrahim, C. Nangpiire, W.M. Detoh, and Y. Fataw, “The Effect of Blockchain Technology in Enhancing Ethical Sourcing and Supply Chain Transparency: Evidence from The Cocoa and Agricultural Sectors in Ghana,” Afr. J. Empir. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 55-64, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.2.6
[25] Y.S. Balcıoğlu, A.A. Çelik, and E. Altındağ, “Integrating Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Theme Extraction via Text Mining,” J. Sustain., vol. 16, no. 22, Article no. 10032, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su162210032
[26] A. Varma, N. Dixit, S. Ray, J. Kaur, “Blockchain technology for sustainable supply chains: A comprehensive review and future prospects,” WJARR, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 980-994, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0804
[27] V. Huynh Anh, “An Organizational Modeling for Developing Smart Contracts on Blockchain-based Supply Chain Finance Systems”, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 239, pp. 3-10, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.139
[28] E. Hedayati, M. Zeinalnezhad, and S. Samiallah, “Identify and Rank Barriers to the Use of Blockchain Technology in the Sustainable Supply Chain of the Food Industry”, J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 26, no. 82, 17-42, 2024. https://scmj.ihu.ac.ir/article_208846.html (In Persian)
[29] P. Noori Doabi, F. Rahnamay Roodposhti, H.R. Kordlouie, and H. Nikoomaram, “Providing a Conceptual Framework Pattern of Blockchain Technology Ethics”, EBAA., vol. 4, no. 2, 7-46, 2024. https://doi.org/10.71907/sebba.2024.12141104508 (In Persian)
[30] S.K. Farah Bakhsh Mohammadi, “The relationship between blockchain technology and supply chain management performance (case study: Iran Khodro Company)”, ICMTT, vol. 2, 2021. https://www.sid.ir/paper/900712/fa (In Persian)
[31] H. Azimi, and S. Paribeigi, “The Effect of Dimension of Unethical Behaviors in the Supply Chain on the Continuity of Communication with the Moderating Role of Organizational Justice”, J. ER., vol. 1, no. 3, 29-46, 2020. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26764180.2020.1.3.2.4 (In Persian)
[32] A. Moayidi, H. Nooralizadeh, and A. Moeini, “Investigating the impact of business ethics dimensions on supply chain management in service companies; case study of the construction industry”, 2nd ICMAECON, 2018. https://civilica.com/doc/781959/ (In Persian)
[33] A.L. Strauss, and J. Corbin, “Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory”, 2nd Ed., Sage, 1998.
[34] U. Flick, “An Introduction to Qualitative Research”, Sage, 1997. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/an-introduction-to-qualitative-research/book278983
[35] J. Samani, N. Khani, B. Yazdani, and M.R. Davoodi, “Designing a Sustainable Supply Chain Model in Food and Agricultural Industries with Emphasis on Economic, Social, and Environmental Dimensions: Application of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM)”, J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 26, no. 84, 77-102, 2024. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20089198.1403.26.84.6.7 (In Persian)
[36] A. Davari, and A. Rezazadeh, “Structural equation modeling with PLS software” Jihad Daneshgahi Publishing Organization, 2014. (In Persian)
[37] H. Danaifard, and S.M. Emami, “Qualitative Research Strategies - Grounded Theorizing”. Manag. Thought, vol. 1, no. 2, 2007. https://www.sid.ir/paper/473152/fa (In Persian)
مدیریت زنجیره تأمین
دوره 27، شماره 88 - شماره پیاپی 88
شماره پیا پی 88 پاییز 1404
آبان 1404
صفحه 75-99

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 30 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 07 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار: 30 آبان 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار